“NOT EVEN-HANDED JUSTICE: Crushing the scorpion of anarchy but sparing the octopus of monopoly”, Artist William A. Rogers, published in Harper’s Weekly, January 21, 1888.
(Snark: Seems kind of apt, given the Occupy movement and response to it. Some things don’t change.)
Image source: Railroad Cartoons Home, http://sophia.smith.edu/~maldrich/topics/political_influence/1888harpersjan21.htm (accessed 12-11-2011)
Attwod, F.G., “He Gathers Them In: A Pacific Sketch”, in Life September 24, 1885. It shows Grover Cleveland (22nd and 24th President of the United States).
Source: Period Paper (15 Aug, 2011), http://www.periodpaper.com
Private collection.
I received a note from David Pope on Twitter, that read “Will plead guilty for this [redacted]. Will plea bargain with this [redacted]”, I will leave it up to you to decide which was guilt, and which redemption.
The first is a response to the proposed mining tax in Australia (and unfortunately gutted - and I say this as someone who works in the mining industry). The second uses images associated with Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility (what a spectacular euphemism).
The first cartoon, even though it uses a familiar trope, does it is a knowledgeable way. It takes the symbology of the octopus/big business and uses it as a continuation to saga, not a repeat. Or, to put it another way, takes advantage of the trope and gives it a novel twist.
Or maybe I’m just besotted with the idea of a planet-sized octopus smoking a cigar.
(Many thanks to David Pope for letting me reproduce these images).
“Socialism” octopus by Louis Wain, circa 1902. Many thanks to Jack Graham for providing a rather unusual political cartoon.
Please note: This is an earlier draft, more a bunch of ideas and notes than an actual argument).
[Author note: this is only a first pass, lots of vague arguments, and logical fallacies. And far to many “it could be argued, it has been argued, studies have shown” - well, you get the idea… Feedback welcome.]
The tentacular undead make an appearance in the vernacular of political cartoons as vampiric octopuses and skulltopuses (1), but never as a zombie octopus (2).
A handful of cartoonist have used a tentacled skull to represent: Al Qaeda, Drug Habits and the USA (military).
DRUG HABIT, Winsor McCay (date unknown)
NUNCA MAS, Haik Hoisington (2006)
AL-QAEDA NETWORK, Ann Telnaes (2001) (3)
“Erkenne die Gefahr! Wähle Österreichische Volkspartei, Wien 1949”
In contrast to the skulltopus, the vampiric or blood-sucking octopus is really, quite common in political cartoons. And it is all Victor Hugo’s fault (4):
‘What, then, is the devil-fish? It is the sea vampire.’ (NB: This depends on your translation, in The Modern Library edition it is ‘What, then, is the devil-fish? It is a suction pad.’ p.350)
‘English sailors call it the devilfish or the bloodsucker’ p351
‘A tearing of the flesh is terrible, but less terrible than a sucking of the blood.’ (In The Modern Library edition: ’ A bite is fearful, but less so than a suction’ p.353)
But does blood-sucking octopus analogous to a leech - something living and natural - and not to the undead vampire? Well…
A giant red vampire squid used to depict the “blood-sucking aspect of trying to make profit … out of people getting sick” (2010) (5)
… No, the word ‘vampire’ comes up often enough to dismiss this argument. For example:
Political parties appeared and disappeared like the thick grounds at the bottom of Turkish coffee cups. Gipsies read fortunes and played addictive violin music that made one lascivious and light-headed. All this frivolity rested like a multitentacled vampire above a huge, backward peasant mass that lived in hunger and rags in villages. The aristocratic vampire with its grotesque appetites sucked dry the energy of millions of wretched humans. –Andrei Codrescu, ‘The Posthuman Dada Guide: Tzara & Lenin Play Chess’ (2009) Emphasise added. (6)
China Miéville
the octopus is identified with the Medusa, demon, and, repeatedly, with the vampire, reacquainting it, if unstably, with ‘traditional’ teratology. The octopus is obsessively depicted as evil – indeed, such a ‘perfection of evil’ that its existence is a vector of heresies of a double god, a cosmic parity of good and evil. (7)
“In the case of the octopus and the vampire, the oral sadism attributed to them seems to stem primarily … from the unconscious urge to recover only the first phase of the nursing situation, i.e., the sucking, not the biting phase — the warm blood a substitute or symbol of the warm milk.” (8) The result is, that “by sucking on the victim, the vampire may be said to merge with the victim” (9).
But where are the Zombie Octopuses in political cartoons?
“The War Octopus” - “Ondanks onze beschaving (of beschavingspeil)”, via Google translate: Despite our culture (or civilisation level).
Published 27 August, 1939 in Algemeen Handelsblad (Amsterdam).
Image Source: International Institute of Social History, Collection: IISG (Pieck, H.), Call # BG D55/850. (Accessed 23rd Oct 2010).
Vulgar Army by Michelle Farran is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Australia License.
